FPSLREB Decisions

Decision Information

Summary:

Unfair labour practice - Complaint under paragraph 23(1)(a) of the Public Service Staff Relations Act (PSSRA) alleging a violation of subparagraphs 8(2)(c)(i) and (ii) thereof - Intimidation against members - Jurisdiction - the complainant filed a complaint against the Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada (PIPSC) - he alleged that his bargaining agent had failed to observe the prohibitions contained in subparagraphs 8(2)(c)(i) and (ii) of the PSSRA - the complainant was an auditor with the Canada Customs and Revenue Agency - he belonged to the Auditors Group (AU) bargaining unit, represented by the PIPSC - he was a steward with the PIPSC - he had dealings with a rival employee organization, the National Automobile, Aerospace, Transportation and General Workers Union of Canada (CAW-Canada) - he resigned his stewardship with the PIPSC because he had been informed that, if he did not do so, he could be removed from stewardship and membership with the PIPSC - he had not been allowed to run for office as Chair of his bargaining unit because the PIPSC considered that he had given support to the CAW-Canada to become the bargaining agent for his bargaining unit - the PIPSC objected to the Board's jurisdiction to hear the complaint - it argued that the matters which formed the subject of the complaint were internal union matters - the Board addressed the issue whether the prohibitions contained in subparagraphs 8(2)(c)(i) and (ii) of the PSSRA apply to an employee organization - the Board found that subparagraphs 8(2)(c)(i) and (ii) of the PSSRA have to be read in their context - the Board determined that the prohibitions contained in paragraphs 8(2)(a), (b) and (c) of the PSSRA do not apply to an employee organization - the Board added that it has no jurisdiction to regulate the internal proceedings of a bargaining agent. Complaint dismissed. Cases cited:Forsen v. Bean (148-2-209).

Decision Content



Coat of Arms - Armoiries
  • Citation:  2000 PSSRB 79
  • File:  161-34-1128
  • Date:  2000-08-29


The full text of this decision is only available in P D F format.

Adobe Acrobat Reader is available for downloading from the Adobe homesite.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.