FPSLREB Decisions

Decision Information

Summary:

No summary has been written for this decision.Please refer to the full text.

Decision Content



Public Service 
Labour Relations Act

Coat of Arms - Armoiries
  • Date:  2011-02-24
  • File:  566-02-1374
  • Citation:  2011 PSLRB 25

Before an adjudicator


BETWEEN

BOUBACAR CABA BAH

Grievor

and

DEPUTY HEAD
(CANADA BORDER SERVICES AGENCY)

Respondent

Indexed as
Bah v. Deputy Head (Canada Border Services Agency)

In the matter of an individual grievance referred to adjudication

REASONS FOR DECISION

Before:
Steven B. Katkin, adjudicator

For the Grievor:
James Cameron, counsel

For the Respondent:
Pierre Marc Champagne, counsel

Heard at Toronto, Ontario,
February 1, 2011.

Grievance referred to adjudication

1 On January 31, 2006, Boubacar Caba Bah (“the grievor”) filed a grievance in which he contested a 10-shift (107.16-hour) suspension imposed on him by the Canada Border Services Agency (“the respondent”) on that date for an incident that had occurred in November 2004. At that time, the grievor worked in the Agriculture Unit of the respondent at Lester B. Pearson International Airport in Toronto, Ontario. The grievance was referred to adjudication on August 3, 2007.

Respondent’s position

2 At the outset of the hearing, counsel for the respondent declared that, although the respondent did not acknowledge any responsibility with respect to the incident, it would not call any evidence. Counsel for the respondent acknowledged and understood that, as the burden of proof in this matter was incumbent on the respondent, I accordingly have no choice but to make the following order:

Order

3 The grievance is allowed, and the grievor is to be compensated for the loss of pay for 10 shifts and any related benefits.

4 The respondent is directed to remove the letter of suspension dated January 31, 2006 and any related documentation from the grievor’s file.

February 24, 2011.

Steven B. Katkin,
adjudicator

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.