FPSLREB Decisions

Decision Information

Summary:

No summary has been written for this decision. Please refer to the full text.

Decision Content



Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board Act and Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act

Coat of Arms - Armoiries
  • Date:  20180301
  • File:  542-02-08, 09, and 11
    XR: 572-02-I1
  • Citation:  2018 FPSLREB 17

Before a panel of the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and and Employment Board


BETWEEN

CANADIAN UNION OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES

Applicant

and

TREASURY BOARD
(Royal Canadian Mounted Police)

Respondent

and

PUBLIC SERVICE ALLIANCE OF CANADA AND PROFESSIONAL INSTITUTE OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE OF CANADA

Indexed as
Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Treasury Board (Royal Canadian Mounted Police)


In the matter of an application for certification under section 54 of the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act


Before:
Margaret T. A. Shannon, a panel of the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board
For the Applicant:
Christopher Rootham, counsel
For the Respondent:
Sean Kelly, counsel
For the Intervenor Public Service Alliance of Canada:
Andrew Raven, counsel
For the Intervenor Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada:
Colleen Bauman, counsel
Decided without an oral hearing.

REASONS FOR DECISION

I. Background

1        On December 19, 2016, and January 19 and March 28, 2017, the Canadian Union of Public Employees (“the applicant”) filed three applications pursuant to s. 54 of the Public Service Labour Relations Act (“the former Act”) to be certified as the bargaining agent for three distinct proposed bargaining units. These three applications concerned employees at the Royal Canadian Mounted Police occupying positions in the Law Enforcement Support - Telecom Operations (“LES-TO”) occupational sub-group, Police Operations Support - Telecommunications Operations occupational sub-group (“PO-TCO”), Law Enforcement Support - Intercept Monitors (“LES-IM”) occupational sub-group, and Police Operations - Intercept Monitoring and Analysis (“PO-IMA”) occupational sub-group.

2        On June 19, 2017, An Act to amend the Public Service Labour Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board Act and other Acts and to provide for certain other measures (S.C. 2017, c. 9) received Royal Assent, changing the name of the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board and the titles of the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board Act and the former Act to, respectively, the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board (“the Board”), the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board Act, and the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act (“the Act”).

3        On October 19, 2017, in Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Treasury Board (Royal Canadian Mounted Police), 2017 FPSLREB 36, the Board determined that the applicant is an employee organization for the purposes of the Act and that it was duly authorized to make the applications. The Board consolidated the three applications and determined that a single bargaining unit was appropriate for collective bargaining, described as follows: “All employees in the Intercept Monitoring and Telecommunications Operations sub-groups of the Law Enforcement Support Group and in the Police Operations Support Group defined in Part I of the Canada Gazette of July 26, 2014” (“the bargaining unit”).

4        The process for certification with respect to these applications is set out in s. 64 of the former Act. At the time the applications for certification were made, s. 64(1.1) provided that once the Board determines a unit appropriate for collective bargaining, it must order a secret ballot representation vote to be taken among the employees in the bargaining unit.

5        Section 64 of the former Act was amended on June 22, 2017, when An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code, the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations Act and the Income Tax Act (S.C. 2017, c.12) came into force. Section 16 of that Act set out that applications for certification filed under the former Act that have not been finally disposed of continue to be dealt with in accordance with the former Act. Thus, as required by s. 66(1.1) of the former Act, a secret ballot vote was ordered.

6        The vote was conducted by electronic ballot. The question on the ballot was as follows: “Do you want the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) to be certified as your bargaining agent?” The result of the vote was as follows:

 
Number of employees eligible to vote 1268
Number of eligible employees who voted 816
Number of eligible employees who voted “Yes”720
Number of eligible employees who voted “No” 96

7        Having considered all of the above, the Board is satisfied that a majority of the employees in the bargaining unit who were eligible to vote, and who cast a ballot, voted to have the applicant represent them as their bargaining agent. On this basis, the Board certifies the applicant as the bargaining agent for the bargaining unit.

8        A certificate will be issued accordingly.

9        The parties have reached an agreement as to the positions that are to be excluded on a managerial or confidential basis. An annex listing them is attached to this decision.

10        For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:

II. Order

11        The application is allowed.

12        The Board certifies the applicant as the bargaining agent for the bargaining unit described as follows:

          All employees in the Intercept Monitoring and Telecommunications Operations sub-groups of the Law Enforcement Support Group and in the Police Operations Support Group defined in Part I of the Canada Gazette of July 26, 2014.

13        A certificate will be issued.

14        The Board declares that any position identified in the annex to this order is a managerial or confidential position.

15        The electronic ballots cast in the vote taken in this matter will be destroyed on the expiration of 45 days from the date of this decision.

March 1, 2018.

Margaret T. A. Shannon,
a panel of the Federal Public Sector
Labour Relations and Employment Board

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.