FPSLREB Decisions

Decision Information

Summary:

No summary has been written for this decision. Please refer to the full text.

Decision Content



Public Service Staff Relations Act

Coat of Arms - Armoiries
  • Date:  2003-12-23
  • File:  142-2-330
  • Citation:  2003 PSSRB 118

Before the Public Service Staff Relations Board


BETWEEN

Federal Government Dockyard Trades and Labour Council East
Bargaining Agent

and

Treasury Board
Employer

RE:   ALTERATION IN THE PROCESS FOR RESOLUTION OF A DISPUTE
Ship Repair-East Group

Before :   Yvon Tarte, Chairperson


(Heard without an oral hearing)


[1]   In Federal Government Dockyard Trades and Labour Council East v. Treasury Board (142-02-330), the Board confirmed the certification of the Federal Government Dockyard Trades and Labour Council East (FGDTLC-E) (bargaining agent) as the bargaining agent of the following bargaining unit (bargaining unit):

All employees of the Employer in the Ship-Repair East Group as defined in Part I of the Canada Gazette of March 27, 1999.

[2]   In a letter dated November 10, received November 20, 2003, the bargaining agent applied to the Board to record an alteration in the process for resolution of a dispute that is applicable to the bargaining unit. The bargaining agent specified that the process of referral of a dispute to arbitration shall now be the process for resolution of any dispute to which it may be a party in respect of the bargaining unit.

[3]   Pursuant to section 39 of the Public Service Staff Relations Act (Act), the Board hereby records the process of referral of a dispute to arbitration as the process for resolution of a dispute specified by the bargaining agent.

[4]   The process for resolution of a dispute hereby recorded by the Board shall be the process applicable to the bargaining unit for the resolution of all disputes effective November 10, 2003 and remains in effect until the process for resolution of a dispute is again altered pursuant to section 39 of the Act.

Yvon Tarte,
Chairperson

OTTAWA, December 23, 2003.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.