FPSLREB Decisions

Decision Information

Summary:

Unifor Local 87-M is the bargaining agent for the Non-Supervisory Printing Services Group bargaining unit – the Treasury Board applied to the Board to amend the Board’s decision describing the bargaining unit of the bargaining agent to reflect recent changes to the occupational group definition as published by the Treasury Board in the Canada Gazette – the Board found the proposed bargaining unit co-extensive with the amended occupational group definition – it also found the proposed bargaining unit appropriate for collective bargaining – accordingly, it granted the application.

Application allowed.

Decision Content

Date:  20190927

File:  525-02-40356

XR:  142-02-334, 548-02-01, 536-02-05 and 06

 

 Citation:  2019 FPSLREB 97

 

Federal Public Sector Labour

Relations and Employment

Board Act and Federal Public

Sector Labour Relations Act

Coat of Arms

Before a panel of the

Federal Public Sector

Labour Relations and

Employment Board

Between

 

Treasury Board

Applicant

 

and

 

unifor local 87-m

 

Respondent

 

Indexed as

 Treasury Board v. Unifor Local 87-M

In the matter of a request for the Board to exercise any of its powers under section 43 of the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act

Before:  Margaret T.A. Shannon, a panel of the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board

For the Applicant:  Sandra Hassan

For the Respondent:  Paul Morse, UNIFOR Local 87-M

 

Decided on the basis of written submissions,

filed April 5, 2019.


REASONS FOR DECISION

I.  Request before the Board

[1]  This is a companion decision to the 2019 FPSLREB 91 decision of the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board (“the Board”) concerning an application under s. 43 of the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations Act (“the Act”). In that decision, the Board amended the description of the Program and Administrative Services Group bargaining unit. The applicant, the Treasury Board (the employer), has also requested an amendment to the description of the Non-Supervisory Printing Services Group bargaining unit, as set out in Unifor Local 87-M v. Treasury Board, 2015 PSLREB 74, to reflect minor consequential amendments to the Non-Supervisory Printing Services Group definition. This decision deals with the latter request. Unifor Local 87-M was given notice of this request and did not respond.

II.  The applicant’s submission

[2]  The applicant changed the Program and Administrative Services Group definition to reflect changes to the current and anticipated program and administrative services work. To maintain a clear delineation between the modified Program and Administrative Services Group definition and other groups excluded from it, the Treasury Board consequently amended the definition of the Non-Supervisory Printing Services Group. The amendments do not change the current membership of the
Non-Supervisory Printing Services Group.

[3]  The new definitions of the Program and Administrative Services Group and the Non-Supervisory Printing Services Group were published in Part I of the Canada Gazette on March 9, 2019.

[4]  The Treasury Board requested that the Board modify the Non-Supervisory Printing Services Group bargaining unit description so that it would read as follows:

All employees of the Employer in the Non-Supervisory Printing Services Group as defined in Part I of the Canada Gazette of March 9, 2019.

 

Tous les fonctionnaires de l’employeur compris dans le groupe Services d’imprimerie (non-surveillantes et non-surveillants), tel que défini dans la Partie I de la Gazette du Canada du 9 mars 2019.

III.  Reasons

[5]  Section 43 of the Act provides that the Board may review, rescind, or amend any of its orders or decisions.

[6]  In any review of bargaining unit structure, the Board must have regard to the employer’s classification of persons and positions, as set out in s. 70 of the Act. Section 70(2) requires that bargaining units be co-extensive with the applicant’s occupational groups unless defining a unit in this way would not permit the satisfactory representation of employees. In such a case, the unit would not be appropriate for collective bargaining.

[7]  The current bargaining unit structure has been found appropriate for collective bargaining, which nothing in the requested change would alter.

[8]  As the applicant’s request meets the requirements of s. 70 of the Act, it
is granted.

[9]  For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:

(The Order appears on the next page)


IV.  Order

[10]  The certification of UNIFOR LOCAL 87-M for the Non-Supervisory Printing Services Group bargaining unit is modified to read as follows:

All employees of the Employer in the Non-Supervisory Printing Services Group as defined in Part I of the Canada Gazette of March 9, 2019.

 

Tous les fonctionnaires de l’employeur compris dans le groupe Services d’imprimerie (non-surveillantes et non-surveillants), tel que défini dans la Partie I de la Gazette du Canada du 9 mars 2019.

[11]  A new certificate will be issued.

September 27, 2019.

Margaret T.A. Shannon,

a panel of the Federal Public Sector Labour Relations and Employment Board

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.