Advanced Search

Jones v. Treasury Board (Department of National Defence) - 2005 PSLRB 49 - 2005-06-03

The third level reply from Diane McCusker, Director General Employee Relations dated 29 December 2003 advised that the grievance was partially allowed to the extent that the one-day suspension was confirmed as reasonable in the circumstance, but the mention of the suspension of the DND 404 licence was to be removed from the

Casey v. Treasury Board (Public Works and Government Services Canada) - 2005 PSLRB 46 - 2005-05-20

1. A reasonable person would consider that the reputation of the employer has been harmed by Mr. Casey's conduct.   [...]  Reasons [151] As indicated in the letter of termination, there are two main reasons why Mr. Casey was dismissed.   [...]  [196] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order

Tanguay v. Statistical Survey Operations - 2005 PSLRB 43 - 2005-05-11

REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Sylvie Matteau, Vice-Chairperson For the Complainant: Michel Houle, Public Service Alliance of Canada   [...]  However, the employer’s inaction could also be a violation of section 147 of the Code and for this reason, the argument cannot be accepted.   [...]  [27] For these reasons, the Board makes the following order: Order

Bungay et al. v. Treasury Board (Department of Public Works and Government Services) - 2005 PSLRB 40 - 2005-04-27

REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Ian R. Mackenzie, adjudicator For the Grievors: Alan Phillips, Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada   [...]  I have concluded that the evidence is relevant and have discussed it in the reasons below.   [...]  Reasons [56] Ms. Cleveland, Ms. Bungay and Ms. LeClair have all claimed acting pay, commencing on October 1, 1998.

Twiddy v. Treasury Board (Department of Human Resources and Development Canada) - 2005 PSLRB 37 - 2005-04-20

In the present case, the employer has no reason to doubt the grievor's sickness.   [...]  For these reasons, I have come to the conclusion that the discipline is merited.   [...]  For these reasons, this grievance is denied. [137] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order:

Leary v. Treasury Board (Department of National Defence) et al. - 2005 PSLRB 35 - 2005-04-15

I believe this failure constitutes a danger to all employees for the following reason.   [...]  He was not responding to any reasonable semblance of danger as per the Code.   [...]  [50] The reason that the decision was made was not one of retaliation.

Sumaling v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada) - 2005 PSLRB 32 - 2005-04-11

[35] I agree with the reasoning and the result of the Krenus, supra, decision.   [...]  I think it is also reasonable to conclude that education in psychology is education in mental health.   [...]  [46] For all the above reasons, I make the following order: Order [47] For all of the above reasons, the grievance is allowed.

Hodgson et al. v. Treasury Board (Transport Canada) - 2005 PSSRB 30 - 2005-03-31

The requirement for consultation is similar to the requirement that decision-makers provide reasons.   [...]  The fact that management discussed shift work in 2000 in management meetings was just reasonable management practice.   [...]  REASONS FOR DECISION [107] Counsel for the employer raised in final arguments the retroactive aspects of the grievances.

Lajoie v. Judd - 2005 PSSRB 29 - 2005-03-31

Reasons for decision [16] In ruling on the objection by the employer with regard to the issue of conflict of interest, we must refer to the wording of the PSSRA:   [...]  [20] In Re Emerald Transport, [2000] CIRB no. 91 (QL), the Canada Industrial Relations Board dismisses a motion to disqualify and finds that no reasonable apprehension of bias exists because a Board Member who has recently rendered a decision involving parties hears a new complaint between the same parties.

Myers v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada) - 2005 PSSRB 26 - 2005-03-24

37.01 There shall be no discrimination, interference, restriction, coercion, harassment, intimidation, or any disciplinary action exercised or practiced with respect to an employee by reason of age, race, creed, colour, national origin, religious affiliation, sex, sexual orientation, family status, mental or physical

Terms of reference of the arbitration board (CATCA v. Treasury Board) - 2005 PSSRB 25 - 2005-03-23

(d) The need to establish terms and conditions of employment that are fair and reasonable in relation to the qualifications required, the work performed, the responsibility assumed and the nature of the services rendered; and

Cloutier v. Treasury Board (Department of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2005 PSSRB 21 - 2005-03-11

He argued that a complaint must be submitted within a reasonable timeframe.   [...]  [24] Mr. Cloutier reiterated that he had to be absent for health reasons in the fall of 2001 and that he wanted the union's advice to fine-tune the wording of his complaint.   [...]  Reasons for the decision [25] The employer raised a point of law regarding the timeframe for the submission of the complaint.

Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canadian Security Intelligence Service - 2005 PSSRB 20 - 2005-02-24

(d) The need to establish terms and conditions of employment that are fair and reasonable in relation to the qualifications required, the work performed, the responsibility assumed and the nature of the services rendered; and