3,378 result(s)
-
2,451.
Wylie v. President of the Canada Border Services Agency et al. - 2006 PSST 0007 - 2006-09-27
FPSLREB Decisions - Staffing Complaints34 For the reasons outlined above, the Tribunal does have jurisdiction to hear this complaint. [...] 35 For the reasons outlined above, the consideration of this complaint by the Tribunal is not rendered moot by virtue of the ending of the acting appointment. [...] Date of Reasons: September 27, 2006
-
2,452.
Arena v. Treasury Board (Department of Finance) - 2006 PSLRB 105 - 2006-09-21
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsEvidence
Union representative
She asked him to come to room 22–C immediately, without giving him any reason. [...] [56] At this meeting, three of the reasons for dismissal were discussed, namely: [...] [112] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
2,453.
Spacek v. Canada Revenue Agency - 2006 PSLRB 104 - 2006-09-19
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour Relations24.01 The Employer shall continue to make all reasonable provisions for the occupational safety and health of employees. [...] It reads that the employer will "continue to make reasonable provisions for the occupational safety and health of employees" and it provides for suggestions and consultations with a view of carrying out reasonable procedures and techniques. [...] [44] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
2,454.
Jolin v. the Deputy Head of Service Canada et al. - 2006 PSST 0006 - 2006-09-11
FPSLREB Decisions - Staffing ComplaintsReasons for Decision Background 1 On July 13, 2006, Chantal Jolin filed a complaint under section 77(1) of the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA) with the Public Service Staffing Tribunal (the Tribunal) following two indeterminate appointments made on or around July 10, 2006 at Service Canada through an advertised process [...] 18 For all these reasons, the Tribunal dismisses the request for an order for provision of information. [...] Date of Reasons: September 11, 2006 1 The English version does not contain the concept of pertinence (relevance).
-
2,455.
Witherspoon v. Treasury Board (Department of National Defence) - 2006 PSLRB 102 - 2006-08-31
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsDiscrimination
Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada was sought but the applications were dismissed with reasons. [...] For these reasons, I would ask that you render a decision that the Board has no jurisdiction in this matter. [...] [20] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
2,456.
Rabah v. Treasury Board (Department of National Defence) - 2006 PSLRB 101 - 2006-08-30
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour Relations• clear, cogent and compelling reasons for the delay; • the length of the delay; [...] There were no compelling reasons for the delay. The only reason given was that Mr. Rabah was not aware of his right to file a grievance. [...] [49] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
2,457.
Chiasson v. Treasury Board (Department of National Defence) - 2006 PSLRB 100 - 2006-08-23
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCompensation
Discrimination
Jurisdiction
Maternity allowance
Parental allowance
Reclassification
Wage rate
Waiver
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Léo-Paul Guindon, adjudicator For the Grievor: Douglas Hill, Public Service Alliance of Canada [...] For both of the above reasons, the employer respectfully requests that the grievances [sic ] be dismissed without a hearing. [...] [46] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
2,458.
Parsons and Carey v. Deputy Head of Service Canada et al. - 2006 PSST 0004 - 2006-08-23
FPSLREB Decisions - Staffing ComplaintsReasons for Decision Background 1 On July 12, 2006, Phyllis Parsons and Marilyn Carey filed complaints with the Public Service Staffing Tribunal (the Tribunal) pursuant to subsection 77(1) of the Public Service Employment Act, S.C. 2003, c. 22, s. 12, 13 (the PSEA) concerning acting appointments made following an advertised [...] Date of Reasons: August 23, 2006
-
2,459.
Duclos v. Bujold - 2006 PSLRB 98 - 2006-08-21
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsJurisdiction
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Sylvie Matteau, vice-chairperson For the Complainant: Herself [...] For all these reasons, the representative has asked that the complaint be dismissed because of lack of jurisdiction. [...] [47] For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
2,460.
Lahaye v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada) - 2006 PSLRB 97 - 2006-08-17
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsSick leave
Given the importance of shooting training, they strike me as reasonable, and the grievor did not argue otherwise. [...] He did not attempt to convince the employer that he had a valid reason for being absent, which, in this case, was not acceptable. [...] [31] For all these reasons, I make the following order: Order [32] The grievance is dismissed.
-
2,461.
Vidlak v. Treasury Board (Canadian International Development Agency) - 2006 PSLRB 96 - 2006-08-14
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsExtension of time
Reasons [10] The applicant has failed to provide cogent reasons explaining the delay and justifying why he should be relieved of the consequences of his failure to file a grievance on time. [...] - clear, cogent and compelling reasons for the delay; - the length of the delay; [...] [16] For all of the above reasons, the PSLRB makes the following order:
-
2,462.
Maessen and McKindsey v. Treasury Board (Department of National Defence) - 2006 PSLRB 95 - 2006-08-02
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsOvertime
Work schedule
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Dan Butler, adjudicator For the Grievor: Paul Champ, counsel [...] The parties presumably included the notice requirement in paragraph 1(d) for good reason. [...] [67] For the reasons outlined above, I deny the grievance of grievor Maessen.
-
2,463.
Fok and Granger v. Treasury Board (Department of Transport) - 2006 PSLRB 93 - 2006-07-28
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsAnnual leave
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Barry Done, adjudicator For the Grievors: Phillip G. Hunt, counsel [...] There is no compelling reason for me to deviate from this consistent approach, and I agree with adjudicator Steward’s reasoning in Reid, at paragraphs 25 and 26, which read as follows: [...] Reasons [21] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order:
-
2,464.
Leduc et al. v. House of Commons - 2006 PSLRB 92 - 2006-07-27
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsWork schedule
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Barry Done, adjudicator For the Grievors: Georges Marceau, counsel [...] [7] During the call, the parties confirmed their settlement and explained the reason for the call: a term of the settlement provided for changes to the current shift schedule to be implemented more than eight months hence (by the end of January 2007).
-
2,465.
Cantin v. Canada Revenue Agency - 2006 PSLRB 91 - 2006-07-21
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCompensation
Pay increment date
Wage rate
Reasons [22] The grievor asks to have the six-month pay increment increase period applied to him so that he would be paid at rate 9 on the CS-01 pay scale beginning on July 17, 2003, pursuant to subclause 1(a) of appendix "A" (CS) of the collective agreement. [...] [32] For the above reasons, the employer's interpretation that the pay increment period for the increase from rate 8 to rate 9 can be determined only on the basis of subclause 1(b) of appendix "A" (CS) is not founded. [...] [33] For the above reasons, I make the following order: Order [34] The grievance is allowed.
-
2,466.
Sherif v. Deputy Minister of the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada et al. - 2006 PSST 0003 - 2006-07-21
FPSLREB Decisions - Staffing ComplaintsReasons for Decision Background 1 On June 19, 2006, Nihal Sherif filed a complaint with the Public Service Staffing Tribunal (the Tribunal) in respect of the acting appointments of Todd Hunter as Deputy Director, Export Competition in December 2005 and on May 29, 2006, as Deputy Director, Market Access. [...] The Court found that “this does not entail (...) that the (...) notice of appeal is premature, because the Regulations establish the latest date for a notice of appeal (...) but no earliest date, so that if an unsuccessful candidate does not for some reason receive a notice of appointment at all, he/she can still file a [...] Date of Reasons: July 21, 2006
-
2,467.
Labadie v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada) - 2006 PSLRB 90 - 2006-07-17
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsInjury-on-duty leave
[22] Thus, it is a discretionary decision, which the employer is required to apply in a reasonable manner, as was done in this case. [...] It permits the employer to grant injury-on-duty leave for as much of the period of absence due to accident or injury as it feels is reasonable . [...] [30] For all of these reasons, I make the following order: Order [31] The grievance is dismissed.
-
2,468.
Ladouceur v. Treasury Board (Department of National Defence) - 2006 PSLRB 89 - 2006-07-14
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsAnnual leave
Operational requirements
Has the employer made every reasonable effort to provide the grievor’s vacation leave in the amount and at such time as the grievor has requested? [...] Financial reasons are not the same thing as operational requirements. [...] [36] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
2,469.
Canadian Federal Pilots Association v. Treasury Board - 2006 PSLRB 86 - 2006-07-12
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsBargaining in good faith
Complaint
Terms and conditions of employment
Unfair labour practice
Work schedule
(b) make every reasonable effort to enter into a collective agreement. [...] [54] Counsel argued that there were five reasons in support of the complaint: [...] [81] For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
2,470.
McQuaid v. Canadian Food Inspection Agency - 2006 PSLRB 87 - 2006-07-12
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsAbsenteeism
Termination (disciplinary)
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Ken Norman, adjudicator For the Grievor: Dave Riffel [...] With regard to the former stance, as I will explain in my reasons, the facts did not bear this out. [...] [38] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
2,471.
Barr and Flannery v. Treasury Board (Department of National Defence) - 2006 PSLRB 85 - 2006-07-07
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsBurden of proof
Discrimination
Grievance procedure
Jurisdiction
Operational requirements
that the standard is reasonably necessary to the accomplishment of that legitimate work-related purpose. [...] Step 3: Is the eight-minute standard reasonably necessary to accomplish this legitimate work-related purpose? [...] [199] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: V. Order
-
2,472.
MacDonald v. Deputy Head of Service Canada et al. - 2006 PSST 0002 - 2006-07-07
FPSLREB Decisions - Staffing ComplaintsAs well, Ms. Ward submitted that no reasons explaining the late filing were provided nor were any exceptional circumstances demonstrated by the complainant. [...] 9 For all these reasons, the request for extension of the time period to file a complaint is granted pursuant to section 5 of the Regulations. [...] Date of Reasons: July 7, 2006
-
2,473.
Appleton et al. v. Treasury Board (Department of National Defence) - 2006 PSLRB 83 - 2006-07-04
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCompensation
Shift differential
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Ken Norman, adjudicator For the Grievors: Carolyn LeCheminant-Chandy, Public Service Alliance of Canada [...] Reasons [20] I begin with the plain language of clause 27.01. However, I do think that one ought to utilize a purposive interpretation. [...] [25] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
2,474.
Sabourin v. House of Commons - 2005 PSLRB 84 - 2006-07-04
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsAdmissible evidence
Estoppel
Termination (disciplinary)
However, I found that to be quite unbelievable for a number of reasons. [...] Management acted reasonably in the circumstances. . . . Post-termination [...] [161] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
2,475.
Burroughs v. Treasury Board (Department of Fisheries and Oceans) - 2006 PSLRB 82 - 2006-06-30
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsAnnual leave
Compensation
[7] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order