5 result(s)
-
1.
Union of Canadian Correctional Officers - Syndicat des agents correctionnels - CSN v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada) - 2007 PSLRB 120 - 2007-12-18
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCompensation
Jurisdiction
TREASURY BOARD (Correctional Service of Canada) Employer Indexed as [...] Union of Canadian Correctional Officers — Syndicat des agents correctionnels — CSN v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada) [...] Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada), 2007 PSLRB 66, reviews the rulings of the Federal Court and Federal Court of Appeal on the right to award interest.
-
2.
Duval v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada) - 2018 FPSLREB 52 - 2018-06-21
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCorrectional officer
Discrimination
Duty to accommodate
Human rights
TREASURY BOARD (Correctional Service of Canada) Respondent Indexed as [...] Duval v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada) In the matter of an individual grievance referred to adjudication [...] 98 The grievor submitted as case law Nicol v. Treasury Board (Service Canada), 2014 PSLREB 3, in which the adjudicator awarded significant amounts under the CHRA’s compensation provisions.
-
3.
Parks Canada Agency v. Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada, Public Service Alliance of Canada and Association of Public Service Financial Administrators - 2000 PSSRB 109 - 2000-12-11
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsBargaining agent
Bargaining unit
Representation vote
Successor rights
In 1999 members of the PSAC struck the Treasury Board, and in the process Parks Canada as it was then under Treasury Board jurisdiction. [...] The Parks Canada Agency was proclaimed on April 1, 1999. The employees of the Treasury Board of Canada who had been working for Parks Canada prior to the transition on April 1, 1999 ceased to be employed by the Treasury Board as of that date and became employees of the new agency. [...] In CUPE and Hospital for Sick Children (Re), the Ontario Board put the question this way:
-
4.
Parliamentary Protective Service v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2020 FPSLREB 7 - 2020-02-03
FPSLREB DecisionsThe NCC asked the Board to declare a single bargaining unit. The NCC had completely restructured its classification plan, based on a system different from the Treasury Board. [...] In this respect, it cites Canadian Union of Public Employees v. Treasury Board (Royal Canadian Mounted Police), 2017 FPSLREB 36 (“CUPE v. RCMP”), in which the Board deemed that the employees of three proposed units performed essentially the same work and therefore should be in the same unit. [...] [247] In this respect, the SSEA quotes as follows from Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada v. Treasury Board, 2006 PSLRB 61, which sees community of interest and duties performed as important indicators when determining appropriate bargaining units:
-
5.
Pruden v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2017 PSLREB 24 - 2017-03-09
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsTime limit
PUBLIC SERVICE ALLIANCE OF CANADA Respondent Indexed as Pruden v. Public Service Alliance of Canada [...] She had written to the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board (“the Board”) to request a summons; however, she had heard nothing in response. [...] me to Misuga v. CUPE Local 2153 and Winnipeg Child and Family Services, Case No (2014) 298/12/LRA, which quotes, from V.S. v. Manitoba Human Rights Commission and Manitoba Government and General Employees’ Union (2010), 190 C.L.R.B.R. (2d) 184, part of paragraph 107 of the Supreme Court of Canada’s analysis of bad