3,378 result(s)
-
1,676.
Treasury Board v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2011 PSLRB 58 - 2011-04-27
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsREASONS FOR DECISION Before: Casper M. Bloom, Q.C., Ad. E., Chairperson [...] Reasons 7 There is no dispute between the parties that before June 1, 1993, the incumbent of the position was identified as a “person employed in a managerial or confidential capacity” under paragraph (a) of that definition in section 2 of the former Act. Pursuant to section 50 of the Public Service Modernization Act, the [...] 10 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,677.
Bremsak v. North Shore Investigations and Mattern - 2011 PSLRB 56 - 2011-04-26
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsComplaint
Unfair labour practice
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Paul Love, Board Member For the Complainant and Applicant: [...] The PIPSC advised Ms. Bremsak that her temporary suspensions would end once the outside procedures had been terminated for any reason. [...] 57 For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,678.
Lapointe v. Treasury Board (Department of Human Resources and Skills Development) - 2011 PSLRB 57 - 2011-04-26
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCompensation
Estoppel
Managerial discretion
Salary level
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Michele A. Pineau, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] In this case, and for the reasons indicated earlier, I believe that the employer’s error had the effect of a promise to the grievor without him having to provide a consideration. [...] 38 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: IV. Order
-
1,679.
Treasury Board v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2011 PSLRB 53 - 2011-04-21
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsExcluded position
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Casper M. Bloom, Q.C., Ad. E., Chairperson [...] Reasons 7 There is no dispute between the parties that before June 1, 1993, the incumbent of the position was identified as a “person employed in a managerial or confidential capacity” under paragraph (a) of that definition in section 2 of the former Act. Pursuant to section 50 of the Public Service Modernization Act, the [...] 10 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,680.
Treasury Board v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2011 PSLRB 55 - 2011-04-21
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsExcluded position
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Casper M. Bloom, Q.C., Ad. E., Chairperson [...] Reasons 7 There is no dispute between the parties that before June 1, 1993, the incumbent of the position was identified as a “person employed in a managerial or confidential capacity” under paragraph (a) of that definition in section 2 of the former Act. Pursuant to section 50 of the Public Service Modernization Act, the [...] 10 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,681.
Treasury Board v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2011 PSLRB 54 - 2011-04-21
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsExcluded position
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Casper M. Bloom, Q.C., Ad. E., Chairperson [...] Reasons 8 There is no dispute between the parties that before December 12, 1988, the incumbent of the position was identified as a “person employed in a managerial or confidential capacity” under paragraph (a) of that definition in section 2 of the former Act. Pursuant to section 50 of the Public Service Modernization Act, [...] 11 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,682.
Treasury Board v. Melançon et al. - 2011 PSLRB 52 - 2011-04-20
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsComplaint
Human rights
Pay equity
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Renaud Paquet, Vice-Chairperson For the Applicant: [...] The Board could also agree to review a decision for other compelling reasons. [...] 25 For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,683.
Treasury Board v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2011 PSLRB 50 - 2011-04-19
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsExcluded position
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Casper M. Bloom, Q.C., Ad. E., Chairperson [...] Reasons 7 There is no dispute between the parties that before June 1, 1993, the incumbent of the position was identified as a “person employed in a managerial or confidential capacity” under subparagraph (c)(i) of that definition in section 2 of the former Act. Pursuant to subsection 94(2) of the Public Service Reform Act [...] 10 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,684.
Treasury Board v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2011 PSLRB 51 - 2011-04-19
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsExcluded position
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Casper M. Bloom, Q.C., Ad. E., Chairperson [...] Reasons 6 There is no dispute between the parties that before April 1, 2005, the position was identified as a “managerial or confidential position” under paragraph (a) of that definition in subsection 2(1) of the former Act. Pursuant to section 50 of the Public Service Modernization Act, the position is deemed to have been [...] 9 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,685.
Treasury Board v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2011 PSLRB 49 - 2011-04-19
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsExcluded position
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Casper M. Bloom, Q.C., Ad. E., Chairperson [...] Reasons 7 There is no dispute between the parties that before June 1, 1993, the incumbent of the position was identified as a “person employed in a managerial or confidential capacity” under paragraph (a) of that definition in section 2 of the former Act. Pursuant to section 50 of the Public Service Modernization Act, the [...] 10 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,686.
Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada v. Treasury Board - 2011 PSLRB 46 - 2011-04-18
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsAnnual leave
Collective agreement
Policy grievance
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Dan Butler, adjudicator For the Bargaining Agent: [...] For reasons that are probably appropriate, I have no extrinsic evidence before me about what was actually discussed in those negotiations. [...] 54 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: V. Order
-
1,687.
Treasury Board v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2011 PSLRB 48 - 2011-04-18
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsExcluded position
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Casper M. Bloom, Q.C., Ad. E., Chairperson [...] Reasons 8 There is no dispute between the parties that before December 12, 1988, the incumbent of the position was identified as a “person employed in a managerial or confidential capacity” under paragraph (a) of that definition in section 2 of the former Act. Pursuant to section 50 of the Public Service Modernization Act, [...] 11 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,688.
Treasury Board v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2011 PSLRB 47 - 2011-04-18
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsExcluded position
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Casper M. Bloom, Q.C., Ad. E., Chairperson [...] … (iii) who is required by reason of the duties and responsibilities of that person to deal formally on behalf of the employer with a grievance presented in accordance with the grievance process provided for by this Act, [...] 10 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,689.
King v. Deputy Head (Correctional Service of Canada) - 2011 PSLRB 45 - 2011-04-13
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCompensation
Correctional officer
Jurisdiction
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Dan Butler, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] The reasons cannot be read otherwise as there is no other basis upon which the adjudicator could have drawn the distinction. [...] 71 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: V. Order
-
1,690.
Magee v. Commissioner of the Correctional Service of Canada - 2011 PSST 0012 - 2011-04-13
FPSLREB Decisions - Staffing ComplaintsReasons for Decision Introduction 1 Kim Magee, the complainant, was a Correctional Officer, CX-02, with the Correctional Service of Canada (the respondent). [...] 22 For the reasons stated above, the complaint is dismissed. Joanne B. Archibald [...] Date of Reasons: April 13, 2011 APPEARANCES: For the complainant:
-
1,691.
Sweiger v. Treasury Board (Department of the Environment) - 2011 PSLRB 44 - 2011-04-12
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCollective agreement
Management rights
Standby pay
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Roger Beaulieu, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] The case states that “‘[a]s soon as possible’ means ‘within a reasonable time’ …” and “… what is a reasonable time must depend upon the facts governing the case in which the question arises.” Also, the Supreme Court of Canada described the phrase “as soon as possible” in W.A. Bechtel Co. v. Stevenson & Van Humbeck [...] 71 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: V. Order
-
1,692.
Shaver v. Deputy Head (Department of Human Resources and Skills Development) - 2011 PSLRB 43 - 2011-04-11
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsBreach of security
Jurisdiction
Security clearance
Termination (disciplinary)
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: John Steeves, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] This is another reason to prefer the evidence of Mr. Decker over that of the grievor. [...] 142 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
1,693.
McMath v. Deputy Head (Correctional Service of Canada) - 2011 PSLRB 42 - 2011-04-05
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsBreach of trust
Correctional officer
Jurisdiction
Rejection on probation
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Renaud Paquet, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] … [105] The plain reading of the PSLRA and the new PSEA is that a probationary employee can be terminated with notice for any reason (or no reason) and does not have access to adjudication. [...] 16 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
1,694.
Shouldice v. Ouellet - 2011 PSLRB 41 - 2011-04-05
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsComplaint
Duty of fair representation
Staffing action
Unfair labour practice
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Stephan J. Bertrand, Board Member For the Complainant: [...] 4 The complainant is of the view that that mention constituted a breach of section 190 of the Act for the following two reasons. [...] 41 For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,695.
MacLean v. Treasury Board (Department of Public Works and Government Services) - 2011 PSLRB 40 - 2011-04-04
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCanadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Public criticism
Staffing action
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Paul Love, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] IV. Reasons 109 In my view, I must consider the following questions: [...] 147 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: V. Order
-
1,696.
Symes v. Deputy Head (Department of Citizenship and Immigration) - 2011 PSLRB 39 - 2011-04-01
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsHarassment
Jurisdiction
Retirement
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Kate Rogers, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] But the grievance does not in any fashion allege that the grievor’s employment was terminated for any reason, much less for disciplinary reasons. [...] 18 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
1,697.
Elazzouzi v. Deputy Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development Canada - 2011 PSST 0011 - 2011-03-31
FPSLREB Decisions - Staffing ComplaintsHe was interested in this appointment process for career development reasons, since he had already had a number of assignments at the PM‑02 level. [...] Mr. Plante was not able to testify in order to clarify the situation because of personal reasons. [...] Date of Reasons: March 31, 2011 APPEARANCES: For the complainant:
-
1,698.
Cooper v. Treasury Board (Correctional Service of Canada) - 2011 PSLRB 38 - 2011-03-28
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCorrectional officer
Overtime pay
Work schedule
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Roger Beaulieu, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] 20 For all those reasons, the grievor submitted that the employer did not make every reasonable effort to allow eight hours between his shifts. [...] 58 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: V. Order
-
1,699.
Eden v. Treasury Board (Canada Border Services Agency) - 2011 PSLRB 37 - 2011-03-24
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsBreach of security
Breach of trust
Remedy
Work schedule
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Kate Rogers, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] 35 It was reasonable for the employer to treat the incident as a serious safety infraction. [...] 67 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: V. Order
-
1,700.
Cyr v. Treasury Board (Department of Human Resources and Skills Development) - 2011 PSLRB 35 - 2011-03-22
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCompensation
Duty to accommodate
Human rights
Mental stress
Remedy
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Renaud Paquet, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] Ms. Cyr indicated that, for health reasons, she did not agree with that decision. [...] 74 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: V. Order