3,378 result(s)
-
1,976.
Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada v. Treasury Board - 2018 FPSLREB 23 - 2018-04-13
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour Relations7 The Institute submitted that the employees covered by the application fall within the bargaining unit for the following reasons: [...] III. Reasons for decision 9 Section 58 of the Act provides as follows: [...] 12 For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,977.
Canadian Association of Professional Employees v. Treasury Board - 2018 FPSLREB 21 - 2018-03-23
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour Relations... 6 The applicant submitted that the employees in question should fall within its bargaining unit for the following reasons: [...] Reasons for decision 8 Section 58 of the Act provides as follows: Determination of questions of membership in bargaining units [...] 11 For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,978.
Osman v. Deputy Head (Department of Employment and Social Development) - 2018 FPSLREB 15 - 2018-02-26
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsJurisdiction
Non-compliance
REASONS FOR DECISION I. Application following the settlement and withdrawal of a grievance [...] III. Reasons 12 A valid and binding settlement is normally a bar to the Board’s jurisdiction to hear the underlying grievance. [...] 18 For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,979.
McCuaig v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2014 PSLRB 55 - 2014-05-23
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCertification revocation
Procedure
Reasons 12 I have examined the application, the reply of the respondent, and the signed consents of 11 of the 13 bargaining unit members and the email of the 1 bargaining unit member who was on leave, all of whom are in agreement with the application. [...] 18 Given the reasons set out in paragraphs 16 and 17 of this decision, I am satisfied that there is no need to conduct a vote under section 95 of the Act. [...] 20 For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,980.
Canadian Food Inspection Agency v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2014 PSLRB 49 - 2014-04-29
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour Relations… (iii) who is required by reason of the duties and responsibilities of that person to deal formally on behalf of the employer with a grievance presented in accordance with the grievance process provided for by this Act, [...] Reasons 7 There is no dispute between the parties that before June 1, 1993, the incumbent of the position was identified as a “person employed in a managerial or confidential capacity” under subparagraph (c)(iii) of that definition in section 2 of the former Act. Pursuant to subsection 94(2) of the Public Service Reform Act [...] 11 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,981.
Canadian Food Inspection Agency v. Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada - 2013 PSLRB 159 - 2013-12-09
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsREASONS FOR DECISION Before: David P. Olsen, a panel of the Board [...] … (iii) who is required by reason of the duties and responsibilities of that person to deal formally on behalf of the employer with a grievance presented in accordance with the grievance process provided for by this Act, [...] 11 For all of the above reasons, the new Board makes the following order:
-
1,982.
Wentges v. Deputy Head (Department of Health) - 2010 PSLRB 58 - 2010-05-04
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsRemedy
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Renaud Paquet, adjudicator For the Grievor: [...] There are therefore no reasons for me to order the respondent to train its managers to manage discipline and to order that it send a letter of apology to the grievor. [...] 17 For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
1,983.
Hérold v. Public Service Alliance of Canada and Gritti - 2009 PSLRB 132 - 2009-10-16
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsComplaint
Duty of fair representation
Time limit
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Renaud Paquet, Board Member For the Complainant: [...] In September 2007, Mr. Gritti wrote to the complainant to explain the reasons for his decision. [...] 18 For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,984.
Renkema v. Commissioner of the Correctional Service of Canada et al. - 2006 PSST 0015 - 2006-11-24
FPSLREB Decisions - Staffing Complaints19 The Tribunal understands that, for reasons of efficiency and fairness, the CSC has decided to use one set of assessment tools for different appointment processes to staff identical positions. [...] 21 For the reasons stated above, the Tribunal grants the request for an order for provision of information, subject to conditions. [...] Date of Reasons: November 24, 2006
-
1,985.
Mulcahy v. Canada Revenue Agency - 2006 PSLRB 51 - 2006-05-05
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsSick leave
. . . Reasons [5] The issue at hand is to determine whether subclause 54.01 (a) of the collective agreement can be used under the present circumstances. [...] [6] Although the grievor submitted that the delays that she encountered between January 7 and 29, 2002 were outside of her control, the employer pointed out that she was, at the time, absent for reasons of illness and was on sick leave prior to that date. [...] [8] For all of the above reasons, I make the following order: Order
-
1,986.
Lamash v. Deputy Head (Correctional Service of Canada) - 2021-11-17
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCorrectional officer
Financial penalty
Termination (disciplinary)
REASONS FOR DECISION I. Individual grievances referred to adjudication [...] Officers cannot reason with an inmate who is CON, and the likelihood of violence escalates. [...] For those reasons, I order sealed Exhibits 5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 38, and 39.
-
1,987.
Serediuk v. Union of Canadian Correctional Officers - Syndicat des agents correctionnels du Canada - CSN (UCCO-SACC-CSN) - 2023 FPSLREB 71 - 2023-07-13
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsDiscrimination
Duty of fair representation
Union activity
III. Reasons for dismissing the complaint A. The scope of the duty of fair representation [...] This shows that reasonable people may reasonably disagree about the best rules for the eligibility to be a shop steward. [...] [59] For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,988.
Bergeron v. Treasury Board (Department of Fisheries and Oceans) - 2021 FPSLREB 132 - 2021-11-30
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsJurisdiction
REASONS FOR DECISION FPSLREB TRANSLATION I. Individual grievances referred to adjudication [...] Yet, it cannot, in any circumstances, be a valid reason for cancelling the agreement. [...] [61] For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,989.
Turcotte v. Treasury Board (Department of Employment and Social Development) - 2020 FPSLREB 93 - 2020-10-23
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCollective agreement
Operational requirements
Overtime
REASONS FOR DECISION I. Individual grievance referred to adjudication [...] For a variety of related reasons, the IQF teams found themselves facing a considerable backlog of work. [...] [62] For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,990.
Edwards v. Treasury Board (Department of Health) - 2019 FPSLREB 124 - 2019-12-19
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsDiscrimination
REASONS FOR DECISION I. Individual grievance referred to adjudication [...] • 1) Discrimination need not be the only reason for the adverse treatment. [...] [87] For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,991.
Turner v. Treasury Board (Department of Fisheries and Oceans) - 2018 FPSLREB 81 - 2018-10-16
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsCollective agreement
REASONS FOR DECISION I. Individual grievance referred to adjudication [...] 47 For all these reasons, the employer submits that the grievance should be dismissed. [...] 62 For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,992.
Perka et al. v. Department of Transport and Treasury Board - 2007 PSLRB 92 - 2007-08-29
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsComplaint
Representation
Unfair labour practice
REASONS FOR DECISION Before: Barry D. Done, Board Member For the Complainants: [...] I find no reason to do so. Mr. Rinn is a CFPA officer with 12 to 13 years experience. [...] 82 For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,993.
Les Terrasses de la Chaudière Inc. v. International Union of Operating Engineers (Stationary), Local 772, Public Service Alliance of Canada and Treasury Board (Public Works and Government Services Canada) - 2005 PSLRB 98 - 2005-08-12
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsJurisdiction
Successor rights
Reasons [9] This application is almost exactly the same as the application in Rostrust Investments Inc. (supra). [...] For the reasons set out below, I have concluded that there has not been a "transfer of jurisdiction". [...] [25] For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,994.
Outingdyke v. Treasury Board (Solicitor General Canada - Correctional Service) - 2003 PSSRB 51 - 2003-06-24
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsEstoppel
Relocation assistance
She testified that this was her sole reason for returning to Warkworth Institution. [...] [...] I believe that my request to be reimbursed the amount of $1,200.19 for this administrative fee is reasonable and fair. [...] These expenses are both actual and reasonable. Article 1.6.2 of the Directive specifically provides that in relocations such as this, employees shall be reimbursed actual and reasonable expenses, and that once relocation is authorized the employee is entitled to all the provisions of the Directive.
-
1,995.
Samba and Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada - 1999-03-15
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsComplaint
Duty of fair representation
Grievance procedure
Mootness
New issue
Rejection on probation
Mr. Charette made representations with respect to the merits of the grievance, that is, the reason why the release was unfair and unjustified. [...] His only right is to express his objections, during the grievance process, to the reasons for his release, although there is no guarantee that the employer will change its mind. [...] Decision Page 10 REASONS FOR DECISION Is it possible to conclude from the complainant's conduct that his complaint was frivolous or vexatious?
-
1,996.
Lecompte and Treasury Board - 1999-07-21
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsJurisdiction
Term employee
Termination (disciplinary)
Lecompte and Treasury Board, Lecompte et le Conseil du Trésor, 166-2-28452 Term position - Non-renewal - Allegation of termination of employment for disguised disciplinary reasons - Jurisdiction - Section 25 of the Public Service Employment Act (PSEA) - Subsection 92(3) of the Public Service Staff Relations Act (PSSRA) -
-
1,997.
Pothier v. Public Service Alliance of Canada - 2023 FPSLREB 101 - 2023-11-06
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsREASONS FOR DECISION FPSLREB TRANSLATION I. Complaints before the Board [...] [12] I refused to accept the recordings as evidence for two reasons. [...] [149] For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,998.
Burns v. Unifor, Local 2182 - 2020 FPSLREB 119 - 2020-12-21
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsDuty of fair representation
I will provide detailed reasons for this decision in the pages that follow but will briefly introduce them now. [...] In the pages that follow, I will attempt to explain the reasons for dismissing his complaints without an oral hearing. [...] [165] For all of the above reasons, the Board makes the following order:
-
1,999.
Copp v. Canada Customs and Revenue Agency - 2003 PSSRB 8 - 2003-01-31
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsBreach of trust
Qualification
Termination (disciplinary)
[70] Mr. Delgaty stated that Mr. Copp's work performance was not the reason for the termination of his employment. [...] [127] In light of all of the above, I find no reason to reinstate the grievor or his ERS. [...] [129] For all the above reasons, this grievance is denied. D.R. Quigley,
-
2,000.
Singh v. Senate of Canada - 2023 FPSLREB 89 - 2023-09-28
FPSLREB Decisions - Labour RelationsProcedure
[4] I further indicated to the parties that more detailed reasons for the order would follow. [...] These are the detailed written reasons for the production order of July 5, 2023. [...] For the reasons that follow, I find that neither claim is supported in this case.