FPSLREB Decisions
Decision Information
No summary has been written for this decision. Please refer to the full text.
Decision Content
Parliamentary Employment and
Staff Relations Act
- Date: 2006-11-22
- File: 485-LP-32
- Citation: 2006 PSLRB 129
Before the Public Service Labour Relations Board
IN THE MATTER OF
THE PARLIAMENTARY EMPLOYMENT AND STAFF RELATIONS ACT
and a dispute affecting
the Public Service Alliance of Canada, as bargaining agent,
and the Library of Parliament, as employer,
in respect of the employees in the Library Technician Sub-group in the Research and
Library Services Group
Indexed as
Public Service Alliance of Canada v.
Library of Parliament
TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR ARBITRATION
To: | Mr. Dan Quigley, Mr. Joe Herbert and Mr. Jim Foley, Members of the Board for the purposes of the arbitration in the above-cited matter |
For the Bargaining Agent: Liam McCarthy, Public Service Alliance of Canada
For the Employer: | Carole Piette, Counsel, and Rolland Desjardins, Library of Parliament |
[1] By letter dated July 27, 2006, pursuant to section 50 of the Parliamentary Employment and Staff Relations Act (PESRA), the Public Service Alliance of Canada requested arbitration for the bargaining unit consisting of “all employees of the Employer in the Library Technician Sub-group in the Research and Library Services Group”.
[2] With its letter dated July 27, 2006, the Public Service Alliance of Canada provided a list of the terms and conditions of employment that it wished to have referred to arbitration. That letter, the terms and conditions of employment and supporting material are attached hereto as SCHEDULE I.
[3] By letter dated August 22, 2006, the Library of Parliament provided additional terms and conditions of employment that it wished to have referred to arbitration. That letter, the terms and conditions of employment and supporting material are attached hereto as SCHEDULE II.
[4] The Public Service Alliance of Canada by letter dated October 19, 2006 provided additional comments concerning the employer’s reply. That letter is attached hereto as SCHEDULE III.
[5] Accordingly, pursuant to section 52 of the PESRA, the matters in dispute on which the Board is to render an arbitral award are those set out as outstanding in SCHEDULE I and SCHEDULE II attached hereto.
November 22, 2006.
Ian Mackenzie,
Acting Chairperson